Home
Reply
Highlighted
Visitor
Posts: 4
0

Different tesselation results on machines with/without Catia V5 installed

Hi

 

I have an executable which simply reads in a .CATPart file and tesselates the surfaces.

If the exec is run on a machine with no Ctaia V5 installed we get good results.

 

If we run on a machine with Catia V5 installed (laptop with 3D settings set to low quality)

we get poor tesselation results.

 

Does the spatial libraries look for any Catia V5 3D accuracy settings ?

 

The tests were run using the same .CATPart file and the same exec.

 

Any ideas ?